Proportionality in Public Policy

The principle of proportionality is one of the fundamental constitutional principles of the Israeli legal system. The legal premise in Israel is that constitutional rights are relative and can be limited in certain situations. Proportionality sets the framework for determining the permissibility of limiting rights, thus settling dilemmas between the promoting of public interests and the protection of human rights.

What makes IDI's Proportionality in Public Policy Program unique is its focus on the perspective of policymakers, and the empirical examination of the integration of rights considerations in the process of drafting policy in the first place. The guiding assumption is that more effectively factoring in proportionality in the policy-making stage will increase the level of awareness and protection of human rights, improve policy results, and decrease the need for involvement of the courts.

The Proportionality in Public Policy Program is a cross-disciplinary and international project. Research is conducted on legal, policy and behavioral axes.

IDI's Proportionality in Public Policy project is supported by a five-year grant awarded to Prof. Mordechai Kremnitzer by The European Research Council.

  • Default Image

    Prof. Mordechai Kremnitzer

    Senior Researcher and Co-Director

    Read More

    Prof. Mordechai Kremnitzer is Vice President of Research at IDI and has been an IDI Senior Fellow since 1994. He currently heads IDI’s Democratic Principles, National Security and Democracy, Arab-Jewish Relations, and Proportionality in Public Policy projects.

     

  • Default Image

    Prof. Raanan Sulitzeanu-Kenan

    Co-Director

    Read More

    The topics of Dr. Raanan Sulitzeanu-Kenan’s studies are the politics of investigative committees, the effect of reputation on government agencies, the judicial proportionality of experts, and the effect of corruption in the public sector and the resulting judicial intervention on voter behavior.

  • Default Image

    Prof. Yuval Feldman

    Researcher

    Read More

    Professor Yuval Feldman is a full professor at the Faculty of Law at Bar-Ilan University and a former fellow of Institutional Corruption Lab at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University.

  • Default Image

    Adv. Talya Steiner

    Project Manager and Researcher

  • Default Image

    Dr. Hadar Arditi-Babchuk

    Researcher

    Read More

    Dr. Hadar Arditi-Babchuk has a doctorate from the Interdisciplinary Program in Brain Sciences at Bar-Ilan University and a master's degree in Epidemiology from Tel-Aviv University.

  • Default Image

    Dr. Keren Weinshall Margel

    Research Fellow

  • Default Image

    Marina Motsenok

    Researcher

    Read More

    Marina Motsenok is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Education at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. She received her BA in sociology and education and her MA in organizational sociology from the Hebrew University.

  • Default Image

    Liat Netzer

    Researcher

  • Default Image

    Prof. Ilana Ritov

    Consultant

    Read More

    Professor Ilana Ritov of the School of Education at Hebrew University of Jerusalem is a consultant for IDI's Proportionality in Public Policy Project. She serves as a resource for the project's research team on issues of decision making and cognitive biases.

  • Default Image

    Lisa-Marie Dammann

    Research Assistant

    Read More

    Lisa Marie Dammann has been studying law at the Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg since 2013

  • Default Image

    Andrej Lang

    Researcher

    Read More

    Mr. Andrej Lang of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg is an expert in German Law who is conducting research as part of IDI's Proportionality in Public Policy project.

This article focuses on the overlap and interaction between the doctrine of proportionality and other doctrines used to assess the constitutionality of state violations of the right to equality

In this paper, we present the first integrative discussion of policy analysis and legal proportionality in order to specify a method of meaningful integration of the proportionality requirements into policy analysis.

Six countries – Canada, Germany, India, Israel, Poland and South Africa – are paradigm examples of modern constitutional systems where rights may be limited through the application
of a constitutional limitations clause. In each jurisdiction, the constitutionality of a rights limitation has come to rely on the principle of proportionality, and the key exercise in judicially reviewing a rights limitation is the proportionality analysis.

Attorney Talya Steiner warns that a Supreme Court's judgment that struck down an amendment of Israel's anti-infiltration law as unconstitutional points to significant flaws in Israel's process of policy-making.

The two day conference will be devoted to the theme of the place of rights considerations in the policy making process, focusing on the different products of our research

  • English
  • English Simultaneous Translation

The principle of proportionality is not always taken into consideration within the discourse relating to privacy and state sanctioned online surveillance. Different jurisdictions and legal systems use explicit or tacit proportionality considerations by deploying various procedural, institutional and technological safeguards in the context of communication networks surveillance.

An international workshop in Madrid, as a part of the "Proportionality in Public Policy" project, funded by a research grant from the European Research Council.