![](/media/22662/icj-tag-page-banner-2.png)
Written By: Dr. Eran Shamir-Borer
The issuance of additional interim orders in the genocide proceedings underway at the ICJ limits Israel’s operational wiggle room in Rafah, but leaves it with some flexibility in the interpretation and implementation of the new orders.
Written By: Prof. Suzie Navot
The International Court of Justice in The Hague (ICJ) issued new temporary orders against Israel this week. Justice Barak’s dissenting opinion would seem to offer an important lesson for the future. Professional, focused, and well-founded legal criticism—as opposed to the very different means that are currently being widely discussed and pursued—is likely the best way to deal with the ICJ.
Written By: Prof. Suzie Navot,
While the ICJ decision briefly mentions the immediate context of the lawsuit, namely the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, Judge Barak directs them to the full picture that they did not address. He writes about the events of October 7 as Israelis know them to be true.
Written By: Prof. Yuval Shany
While neither Israel nor South Africa achieved a complete win, one thing is clear: the story of Israel before the ICJ is only beginning
Written By: Prof. Amichai Cohen
Prof. Amichai Cohen, a senior fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute and an expert in international law, made the following comments on the International Court of Justice (ICJ) decision today regarding provisional measures in the case of South Africa v. Israel on the Application of the Genocide Convention.
On January 11th, the court will begin by hearing South Africa’s oral argument, with Israel presenting its counter argument on January 12th.
What does the international law state and what are the possible implications of these proceedings on the ongoing war and Israel’s international standing? We’ve compiled a shortlist of important information you should have.