
Written By: Dr. Guy Lurie
On November 5, 2023, Minister of Justice Yariv Levin notified the High Court of Justice that he will convene the Judicial Selection Committee within 15 days. Selecting judges is not possible in such a short time frame, so we will have to wait and see whether this decision leads to the completion of judge appointments to the vacant positions.
Written By: Dr. Guy Lurie
Justice Hayut's retirement from the presidency of the Supreme Court was well-known in advance, however, the Minister of Justice's refusal to convene the Judicial Selection Committee leaves Israel with a temporary replacement during a national emergency.
Written By: Prof. Amichai Cohen, Prof. Yuval Shany
Three petitions before the Israeli Supreme Court are transforming the usually slow month of September into a pivotal one in Israel’s ongoing judicial crisis.
Written By: Dr. Guy Lurie
The Judicial Selection Committee has not met for more than a year, and during this period, various positions held by judges have been vacated.
Written By: Dr. Guy Lurie
IDI expert Dr. Guy Lurie met with KAN's Mark Weiss to discuss Supreme Court Justice Yosef Elron's announcement that he would seek election as the next Supreme Court president, a decision that flies in the face of the "seniority method" that has been used to select the court's president to date.
Written By: Dr. Guy Lurie
The law is clear. The Minister is obligated to convene the committee when judicial vacancies appear. By evading this responsibility, he is failing in his duty.
Written By: Dr. Guy Lurie
Dr. Guy Lurie, IDI expert discusses the court's use of the Standard of (Extreme) Unreasonableness and current status of the judicial overhaul.
Written By: Dr. Jesse Ferris
Dr. Jesse Ferris with New York Times' Bret Stephens and Prof. Avi Bell discuss the complexities of the judicial overhaul and its significance on the future of Israel on Sapir Conversations podcast.
Written By: Dr. Guy Lurie
Dr. Guy Lurie in an in-depth interview with The Jewish Time podcast's Jeff Silberblatt on the attempted judicial overhaul and its implications on Israel's future.
Written By: Prof. Amichai Cohen, Dr. Guy Lurie
The research examined 42 countries included all the OECD member states along with other leading democratic countries.
The Israel Democracy Institute congratulates President Isaac Herzog on his extraordinary efforts. While the President’s plan contains some problematic elements, if it were to be adopted in its entirety as a package, we would support it because it safeguards our democracy and bolsters key elements of our constitutional foundations.
Written By: Prof. Tamar Hermann, Dr. Or Anabi
66% of Israelis: Supreme Court should have power to strike down laws that are incompatible with Israel’s Basic Laws | On Judicial Selection Committee: 63% Support Current Principle Requiring Agreement between Politicians and Justices.
Written By: Dr. Guy Lurie
Rabbinical courts, where appointments are based on political loyalty, offer a cautionary model of a judicial nightmare
Written By: Prof. Amichai Cohen, Prof. Yuval Shany
Since 1953, judicial appointments in Israel have been made through a Judicial Selection Committee in which legal professionals—judges and lawyers—are in the majority and politicians in the minority. The new Israeli government’s plans for legal reform turn this system on its head and allow the coalition to fully control appointments to all parts of the judiciary, thus consolidating its dominant position in all three branches of government.
Written By: Dr. Guy Lurie
Despite controversy, changes to the Judicial Selection Committee, must be made with broad consensus - and not by slimmest of majorities.
Written By: Dr. Nadiv Mordechay
After three contentious election campaigns Israel's new government has been sworn in. IDI's experts weigh-in with their recommendations on the most important issues on the agenda.
The Israel Democracy Institute responded Thursday to the proposed bill to cancel the seniority system and deferral of deliberations on choosing Esther Hayut as the president of the Supreme Court, saying such steps harm the basic principles of the work of the judicial branch.